The (unsexy) Secret of Apple’s Success

The discussion on Apple’s case was exciting. We attributed Apple’s success to various factors: the founder Steve Jobs, the design, the product, the innovation, and perhaps even the advertisement. These are the glamorous headline stories news like to tell. One thing I was still curious after the discussion was that why did Tim Cook became Apple’s CEO after Steve Jobs and how does he compare to Steve Jobs. The research leads me to discover a secret of Apple’s success–Tim Cook, the supply chain guru. The day-to-day operation may seem unsexy compared with other things discussed in the case study, but it may be your first time hearing this part of Apple’s story.


Not a manufacturing company…anymore

When in class, we described Apple as a product company, a design company, a luxury/premium-pricing company, and an advertisement company. No one thought of it as a manufacturing company. It is true because of Tim Cook. Tim Cook left IBM and joined Apple in 1998 with 1 critical mission–fix Apple’s broken supply chain. Before Cook, Apple’s supply chain was scattered and inefficient. Since the beginning of his time at Apple, Cook wanted to pull Apple out of manufacturing. Even today, he has an eagle eye on Apple’s supply logistics and probably understands the supply chain better than most other CEO in the tech world today.

He reduced the number of Apple’s key suppliers from 100 to 24, and forced them to offer better deals. To implement the Just-In-Time logistic strategy (an advanced supply chain strategy first implemented by Japanese manufacturing companies), he also convinced many suppliers to locate next to Apple’s plants. He closed 10 out of 19 Apple warehouses and cut inventory from one month to 6 days, which means inventory turnover became much faster.

What is astonishing was that by September 1999, he managed to bring down inventory further to 2 days, and cut the production process for making an Apple computer from 4 to 2 months. It is to overlook the importance of supply chain management, but Tesla’s struggle with production at scale shows the difficulty in balancing smooth operation and cutting-edge innovation.

“Inventory is fundamentally evil,” said Cook when interviewed by Fortune. 

Cook’s focus on logistical discipline has turned Apple inventory management from a mess to the gold standard for computer-manufacturing efficiency.

Operation Brilliance

Apple is known for its slick design and advertising campaigns, but it is the state-of-art cost control that makes Apple the biggest cash generator in Silicon Valley. By cost control, I don’t mean cost-cutting. Cook strategically spends on suppliers to ensure Apple’s competitive position in the market.

Shortly after he joined Apple, he booked $100m worth of holiday season air freight months in advance. This ensured expedited delivery for the new iMacs while leaving Compaq and other PC firms with air cargo (slower). This may not look like a big deal, but delivering in time was crucial in making a new product mainstream.

In 2005, Apple introduced iPod Nano. What I remembered about it was it came in more colors and has more storage than the iPod clip but less bulky than the iPod classic. In retrospect, it was a revolutionary music play because it used more flash memory than existing products on the market while maintaining a small size. Cook’s team accurately predicted tremendous demand for the Nano, and prepaid $1.25 billion to big suppliers such as Samsung and Hynix to effectively corner the market through 2010 on a specific kind of memory.

Cook helped apple to transform not only in logistics but also in customer experience. In the early 2000s, Cook led Apple to replace salespeople in Best Buy with Apple’s own well-trained employees. Eventually, it became the “Geniuses Bar” in Apple stores we see today.

New Records of R&D Spending

Cook was never hesitant when it comes to R&D spending. He spends on R&D much more than Jobs, and he continues to break his own record.



Since Apple’s design is always ahead of its competitors, often it needs to invent manufacturing equipment as well.  In 2013, Apple worked with key suppliers to customize robots to manufacture new iPhones and iPads, and spent about $10.5 billion to create these special tools. Apple engineers often spend weeks at facilities in Asia to make sure that parts and equipment are working properly. Although Apple itself is not a manufacturing company, it has tight control over the production line to ensure perfection in the details.

Ending Thoughts

Without Steve Jobs, Apple would not be a tech giant like it is today. After I read about Tim Cook, I was amazed by these less known but impressive stories. I admire his operation savviness, and the new tax bill certainly poses a new challenge as well as an opportunity for him.

I am curious about whether Apple employees see a change in company culture after Tim Cook has become the CEO, and how would Apple today describe themselves. And of course, I am interested to see what Apple is going to do with its cash both within the company (employee benefits) and outside the firm.

10 thoughts on “The (unsexy) Secret of Apple’s Success

  1. This is such a great post Jenny! Tim Cook doesn’t have nearly the same amount of hype or appreciation that Steve Jobs had, but he has been doing a phenomenal job, as you point out. To cut the production time of an Apple computer in half is incredible! It makes you wonder how he is going to improve a system that is already so efficient, especially with the recent introduction of the HomePod.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Nice job! Tim Cook doesn’t get the credit that the myth of Jobs garners, but he is mostly responsible for the continued success of Apple. One of the reasons Apple is so profitable on the balance sheet is that it is great at cutting costs and keeping its overhead expenses down. However, it will be interesting to see if “the supply chain whisperer” can innovate and lead the next breakthrough for Apple, with iPhone sales declining.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Interesting post Jenny! I completely agree with you that Cook is a truly hidden figure in Apple’s continuous success. For many companies, the more “innovative” products they launch, the less of an effect that such innovation leaves on people. But the reason behind Apple’s continuous success and such thick layers of fans is Tim Cook’s consistent support for R&D, which led to jaw dropping new products every time!


  4. Great post! You take a unique perspective on analyzing Apple – until now, we have mainly discussed what makes their tech products and branding so great, not how they get to that point. Cutting inventory and manufacturing time reminded me of case studies on Dell’s success story, only Apples has been better at maintaining that success. I do agree with John, however, that mastering the supply chain is important, but only if you have top-notch innovations to manufacture. I’m interested to see what breakthrough Apple will introduce next.


    • I agree with both of you. Not to discredit Cook’s genius, but I think Cook fits more into a COO, not a CEO. Jobs had a clear vision and was creative and even bold. FB seems to have a solid management in that Zuckerburg drives the company into the future he sees and Sandberg makes sure everything happens. I don’t see a team similar to it at Apple right now.


  5. Great idea for a blog post! The media is quick to report on the choices that companies make that will garner the most views, but quite often these “unsexy” ideas are the true driving forces. Tim Cook really was the ultimate complement to an Apple company that had already established itself as as one of the best innovators in the tech world. Remarkably, he seems to be equally skilled at innovating himself as Apple’s success has been undeniable since he became CEO. Many were quick to be skeptical about the new HomePod, but I’m sure Tim Cook knows what he’s doing.


    • I really agree with this comment. Jobs was a visionary in the sense that he was able to launch new products into new markets. The iPhone became the first wildly popular smartphone and iPad basically reinvented the tablet market. But products like these carry high risk. The real moneymaker for Apple is their continual improvement in products that keep customers coming back for more. Coupling engineering talent with a high spend on R&D is a key to Apple’s current success.

      Liked by 1 person

  6. I am happy that you addressed this “elephant in the room”! I was surprised after our Apple class that we didn’t touch upon Cook’s commencement speech at MIT that was loaded with rich discussion topics. The overarching theme here seems to be that one must always think towards the future. Not every prediction needs to be 100% accurate, but a game plan must be put in place well in advance to have any chance at success.


  7. I’m equally as amazed by this side of Apple! I did not know any of these lesser known stories, nor did I realize how influential Tim Cook was before he became CEO. Thanks for sharing!


  8. Really insightful post Jenny. Like everyone has said, nice to finally hear the other side (there always is one). Specifically, the other side of a story that somehow never gets enough press despite how big Apple is. Given how complex Apple’s products are, it’s clear they would have a very difficult time vertically integrating so having a supply chain guru is the next best thing.


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s